2024

2024

Hi Bandaru sorry for the late reply: The error you’re encountering in SolidWorks is related to a missing or corrupt file (swbrowser.sldedb), which is part of the standards database used for cosmetic threads, hole wizard, and toolbox components. Here’s how you can fix this issue: Solution Steps: 1. Repair SolidWorks Installation: • Go to Control Panel > Programs > Programs and Features. • Locate SolidWorks and click on Modify or Repair. • Follow the prompts to repair the installation, which will restore any missing or corrupted files. 2. Check Toolbox Settings: • In SolidWorks, go to Tools > Options. • Under System Options, select Hole Wizard/Toolbox. • Ensure that the directory path listed for the Toolbox folder points to the correct folder where SolidWorks is installed. This should include the file swbrowser.sldedb. 3. Re-link the Missing Database: • Manually navigate to the path displayed in the error (C:\SOLIDWORKS Data\lang\english\swbrowser.sldedb). • If the file is missing, you can copy it from another working installation or request a fresh copy from SolidWorks support. 4. Reinstall Toolbox Components: • If none of the above steps work, try uninstalling and reinstalling the Toolbox by running the SolidWorks installation manager and selecting Toolbox under the installation options.

Cooked 🤡 Jk jk. Can try reinstalling? Do you get an error? If you delete the folder before uninstalling, you might not be able to uninstall. In that case just try “reinstalling” and see if it restores those folders

2024 Edition

Nice 64 GB RAM 🤣 SSD though 😳

Threadripper 😳

My CPU and I/O feels potatoish compared to yours 🤣

2023

Alienware M17 R4 CPU: i7-10870H GPU: RTX 3080 LAPTOP RAM: 32 GB DDR4 RAM STORAGE: 1 TB SSD OS: WINDOWS 11 SOLIDWORKS: 2023 RESULTS: Graphics: 29.1 sec Processor: 30.8 sec I/O: 39.6 sec Overall: 99.5 sec Rendering: - RealView Performance: 27.2 sec Simulation: -

2023 We see more advance play with shadowns and lighting! A common theme here is that once a student initiates a design, subsequent generations improve on it! While this design might looks simple, we assure it is not! Every detail is perfectly rendered with very high-resolution decals! This whole sword was modeled from scratch by a student! From the pummel to the edge of the blade!

You can fix this by clicking Windows key+left button on your keyboard while the ANSYS window is open. Source: Mr Chai Koon Hoe

Just noticed some of you directly deleting the folders above without uninstalling first LOL. Only delete the files after you have uninstalled. You can find the uninstall button for Abaqus here:

I believe this issue can be solved by going to Options Select Display then under ''Edge display in shaded with edges mode'' select HLR and uncheck the "Optimize for thin parts" box Courtesy: Dylan Hope this helps! 😀

Un factor de forma de placa base se refiere al tamaño físico y diseño de la placa base, lo que a su vez determina el tamaño y forma de la carcasa del ordenador en la que se puede instalar. Existen varios factores de forma de placa base estándar, incluyendo ATX, Micro-ATX, Mini-ITX y E-ATX, entre otros. Estos estándares especifican las dimensiones de la placa base, así como la ubicación y disposición de componentes como el zócalo de la CPU, las ranuras de memoria, las ranuras de expansión y otros conectores. El factor de forma más común para ordenadores de sobremesa es el ATX, que mide 305 mm x 244 mm. Este tamaño permite un número razonable de ranuras de expansión y puertos, así como un espacio adecuado para la refrigeración. Micro-ATX es un factor de forma más pequeño que mide 244 mm x 244 mm, y se utiliza a menudo en ordenadores de sobremesa económicos o compactos. Suele tener menos ranuras de expansión y puertos que el ATX, pero es más asequible y fácil de instalar en carcasas más pequeñas. Mini-ITX es aún más pequeño, midiendo solo 170 mm x 170 mm. Se utiliza comúnmente en PCs de factor de forma pequeño (SFF) y sistemas de cine en casa, pero tiene opciones de expansión limitadas. E-ATX, o ATX extendido, es un factor de forma más grande que se utiliza a menudo en sistemas de alta gama para juegos o estaciones de trabajo. Mide 305 mm x 330 mm o más, y ofrece más ranuras de expansión y puertos que el ATX o Micro-ATX. También puedes mencionar que elegir el factor de forma adecuado de la placa base es una consideración importante al construir un ordenador, ya que afecta al tamaño y características del sistema. "Quiero aclarar que no hablo español y utilicé Google Translate para traducir el mensaje anterior al español. Si hay algún error de traducción, por favor háganmelo saber y trataré de corregirlo. ¡Gracias!" 😄

Oh that’s a good question! You can create a part in context of an assembly. Solidworks allows you to create parts inside the assembly itself. Basically, instead of opening your Arduino as a part file and going between two part files back and forth, you can open the A. Uno as an assembly file. Then inside the assembly file click on the arrow next to Insert Component and click New Part. You can then create the part (enclosure) using the Uno as a reference without needing to measure its dimensions. Here’s a video example:

There are a few ways to save on memory. 1) Can try creating sub-assemblies and saving them as a part (e.g. the turrets) 2) Can also try Large Design Review mode (I have embedded the video here. To activate it go to the 1:11 mark) Option no.2 is very effective in dealing with huge amounts of parts and is designed to help laptop GPUs. Regarding getting rid of the wire-like diagrams thingy, it should disappear after you click render.

Right one more thing. Someone just advised me to try Nvidia studio drivers instead of using the default ones. You can try that as well: It is under Geforce Experience: https://www.nvidia.com/en-my/geforce/geforce-experience/download/ Let me know how it goes!

I think it is an issue with Nvidia's driver. I could still use SOLIDWORKS Visualize earlier this year, but ever since I updated the driver, Visualize has stopped working for me as well. I am also using a 3000 series Nvidia GPU as well. You can try this hotfix driver that Nvidia released and see if it does anything: https://nvidia.custhelp.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/5450 While waiting for an update the best we can do right now is to use Photoview 360 to render or use the uni PC and run Visualize. Unless anyone found a solution to bypass this we are stuck waiting for a patch. The good news is, it is not your hardware 😂

There are two types of Solidworks rebuild errors (red or yellow): Errors indicate critical issues that need to be resolved before the model can be successfully built or exported. Errors can include issues such as missing references, incorrect dimensions, or conflicting features. If an error is not resolved, it may prevent the model from being built, or the resulting product may not function correctly. For example, if you receive an open contour error, it usually means that the sketch is incomplete and requires closing ("loop" not closed). Warnings indicate potential issues or suggestions for improving the design. While warnings are typically less severe than errors and may not prevent the model from being built, they should still be addressed, as they can affect the model later on. One common warning when creating parts comes from relationships, such as when you create a perpendicular relationship for two lines, but one of the lines already has an angle assigned to it. This can trigger a warning, but you can still proceed with the sketch/extrusion. To address a warning, you can typically edit the sketch or feature associated with the warning by selecting the icon next to it. To resolve the warning, you may need to delete or modify elements such as lines, circles, squares, dimensions, or relationships. Once the necessary changes have been made, you can redraw any required lines to complete the sketch or feature. Do you have a screenshot of a current rebuild error? I can show an example of how to solve it using the screenshot 😎